Joshua Topolsky of the Engaget blog reports that the Minnesota Supreme Court will hear arguments about whether the State of Minnesota and/or the manufacturer of the Intoxilyzer 5000 machine must turn over the soruce code that operates the Intoxilyzer equipment. In discovery motions, the defense had demanded the source code but both the State of Minnesota and manufactgurer CMI corporation have refused to release the code.
More on State's Failure to Turn Over Intoxilyzer Source Code May Result in Dismissal of Charges
Filed under DUI discovery motion, breathalyzer by 
In a gesture of appreciation to his fellow criminal defense lawyers, Guy Sharpe has published his Motion for Full Information on the Intoxilyzer 5000. Guy states that he frequently receives calls about this Motion and he has released it to the DUI defense community as a "thank you" to the many DUI and criminal defense lawyers throughout the State who have generously shared their expertise with him.
