<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DUI Laws Unfair to Women? &#8211; Detailed Scientific Proof</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.4georgiadui.com/2006/08/18/dui-laws-unfair-to-women-detailed-scientific-proof/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.4georgiadui.com/2006/08/18/dui-laws-unfair-to-women-detailed-scientific-proof/</link>
	<description>Guy Sharpe's Georgia DUI Resource Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:29:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kentucky DUI Defense Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.4georgiadui.com/2006/08/18/dui-laws-unfair-to-women-detailed-scientific-proof/#comment-760</link>
		<dc:creator>Kentucky DUI Defense Lawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://host.jonathanginsberg.com/~gadui/?p=29#comment-760</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;DUI Blog Review - 2006 - Week 52...&lt;/strong&gt;

The Austin DWI Lawyer featured an article by Attorney Jamie Spenser entitled Watch The Witness, which described how officers use cheat sheets to answer defense lawyer&#039;s testimony in the courtroom. The Underdog Blog featured an article by Attorney Jon ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>DUI Blog Review &#8211; 2006 &#8211; Week 52&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The Austin DWI Lawyer featured an article by Attorney Jamie Spenser entitled Watch The Witness, which described how officers use cheat sheets to answer defense lawyer&#039;s testimony in the courtroom. The Underdog Blog featured an article by Attorney Jon &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin DWI Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.4georgiadui.com/2006/08/18/dui-laws-unfair-to-women-detailed-scientific-proof/#comment-759</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin DWI Lawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 16:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://host.jonathanginsberg.com/~gadui/?p=29#comment-759</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;DWI Blog Review...&lt;/strong&gt;

Jon Katz posts about the junk science aspects of the standardized Field Sobriety Tests.&#160;Tests able to detect the presence of alcohol, but not the level of alcohol, such as the HGN should be recognized as such. Lawrence Taylor finds a......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>DWI Blog Review&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Jon Katz posts about the junk science aspects of the standardized Field Sobriety Tests.&nbsp;Tests able to detect the presence of alcohol, but not the level of alcohol, such as the HGN should be recognized as such. Lawrence Taylor finds a&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ca dui lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.4georgiadui.com/2006/08/18/dui-laws-unfair-to-women-detailed-scientific-proof/#comment-758</link>
		<dc:creator>ca dui lawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://host.jonathanginsberg.com/~gadui/?p=29#comment-758</guid>
		<description>It will be a big problem for the women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be a big problem for the women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry</title>
		<link>http://www.4georgiadui.com/2006/08/18/dui-laws-unfair-to-women-detailed-scientific-proof/#comment-757</link>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 00:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://host.jonathanginsberg.com/~gadui/?p=29#comment-757</guid>
		<description>The issue is not whether contraceptives or anything else raise the level of alcohol tested but whether a woman or any person has a high enough alcohol level to interfere with or impair with safely driving a vehicle.

If one person ate while they drank and another one did not eat while they drank (before or after) one may be drunker than the other.  A taller person my show different levels than shoter people but the standard agreed on in a country or state is what is agreeed as a level that is or approaches danger.

You can get arrested for using legal and illegal drugs that impair operating a vehicle, not even alcohol.  In the end, its still a judgment call - the device that measures how much alchol is present is one standard used.  That women are smaller or have a different metabolism or take drugs (contraceptives) which affect their stated alcohol level means that is the effect on them.

The argument made is trying to say if men can drink more and still not make the cut, then why not women.  Its&#039;s the same stupid argument women make about equality like they have no differences in biology or approach to life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue is not whether contraceptives or anything else raise the level of alcohol tested but whether a woman or any person has a high enough alcohol level to interfere with or impair with safely driving a vehicle.</p>
<p>If one person ate while they drank and another one did not eat while they drank (before or after) one may be drunker than the other.  A taller person my show different levels than shoter people but the standard agreed on in a country or state is what is agreeed as a level that is or approaches danger.</p>
<p>You can get arrested for using legal and illegal drugs that impair operating a vehicle, not even alcohol.  In the end, its still a judgment call &#8211; the device that measures how much alchol is present is one standard used.  That women are smaller or have a different metabolism or take drugs (contraceptives) which affect their stated alcohol level means that is the effect on them.</p>
<p>The argument made is trying to say if men can drink more and still not make the cut, then why not women.  Its&#039;s the same stupid argument women make about equality like they have no differences in biology or approach to life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
